By Neil Gerlach, Sheryl N.
A Writer on WritingMargaret Atwood offers two observations about authorial historicity: This article explores the ways in which Atwood adapts her adopted precursors in Alias GraceThe Blind Assassinand the Maddaddam Trilogy — These were reworked later and published as Negotiating with the Dead: A Writer on Writing Atwood, Early in the book she comments on her influences and how she has evolved as an author.
Two comments stand out.
This raises the question of whether she understands the Platonic implications of this Romantic shadow. If we can never be sure, she may understand more than she admits.
Is she suggesting authors inherit, process, and adapt their precursors? If so do they transmit their precursors in an evolved form or do they struggle to overcome their precursors and not transmit them at all?
Do the terms of discourse and the shadow of the Romantic movement amount to the same thing, at least for some authors and some genres? A Theory of Poetry but on a larger and more complex scale?
In other words, do authors need to situate themselves within it, or react against it, or can they simply ignore it?
These questions are open-ended and each author would probably answer them differently. During the 19th and 20th century, British and Commonwealth novels with origins traceable to the Romantic movement followed a trajectory which has been called many things: If the history of literature can be conceived as the archaeology of memes, we can see a range of dialectics within this literature: These dialectics are all variations of an original or index meme: Presumably because philosophy is aligned with the rational mind analogous with the headPlato believed it had the highest truth-claims.
Presumably because it comes from the spirited mind analogous with the hearthe believed poetry had lesser truth-claims, as it could be easily corrupted by the appetitive mind analogous with the lower abdomen.
Nevertheless, poetry could also be noble, and did have its own truth-claims, provided it was the kind of poetry Plato approved of. As poets were not philosophers, he believed they had the potential to create bad poetry. Their occupation was to tell stories about heroes and the gods, but those stories could tell lies, be subversive, and corrupt.
They traded in copies, and lived in the shadows, similar to the Romantic shadow Atwood alerts us to. Therefore, he believed philosophers should be leaders and poets should not.Review Essay Questions Concerning Biotechnology/ies Lynne Alexandrova University of Toronto Becoming Biosubjects: Bodies, Systems, Technologies.
(Oryx and Crake, Atwood, , p. ). Leveraging off that query to encompass the double-edged advances of technoscience in general, here is a response question—simultaneously philosophical and. Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood That is a similar comparison to what Margaret Atwood has created in her novel Oryx and Crake where the people of the world are greedy enough that they will destroy the Earth to the point where it is unrecognizable.
4/4(3). In Oryx and Crake (), The Year of the Flood () and MaddAddam () she creates a dystopic narrative that depicts the collapse of civilization, warning her readers as to what might happen. Confounders in epidemiological research papers kant vs mill deontology vs utilitarianism essay robotics research papers six dialectics of intercultural communication essay sukses terbesar dalam hidupku essay lpdp dikti hard work and dedication essay koi cafe argumentative essays, short story point of view essay piangero la sorte mia analysis.
Aug 24, · Literary Essay; Literary Essay. Literary Masterpieces Matrix.
and Claude Levi-Strauss in anthropology. This paper focuses on Strauss’s Structure and Dialectics, Genette’s Five Types of Transtextuality, and Barthes’s The Death of the Author. Oryx And Crake Literary Essay;. A critical review of modernization theory joel r campbell troy university introduction: modernization and diffusion rostow, in the stages of economic growth (), is the an essay in recent history (new york: harper and row, ) a critical review of modernization theory