This is the statistically correct way to represent relative human contributions to the greenhouse effect.
But, I think this reasoning is absolutely wrong. Lets say that the oil not burned so not releasing CO2 into the atmosphere is subtracted from the total amount of oil that we pump here or import. Then multiply that amount by 3.
That gives you a big number, lots of pollution, right? For the record, I am in favor of conservation, recycling, etc. I ask you just one question more. Consequently, making the waters better for marine life, increasing that source of food for everybody, helping the environment?
I am a little confused by your comment though. Perhaps it is indeed a positive environmenal effect of fossil fuels. A simple subtraction of the weight of water vapour from the weight of CO2 makes absolutely no sense at all, unless you can demonstrate that the effects of the water vapour directly offset the effects of the CO2 in precise proportion to the weight of the two.
As for the larger question of the nature of the current Climate Change anthropogenic Vs. I am not a climate scientist, though I like to feel that my engineering background allows me to evaluate claims about physical systems with a degree of accuracy.
I do not have the requisite education, for example, to assess the claims made by biologists that they have successfully cloned a sheep and other animals. Nonetheless to doubt those claims without any reason tends towards the irrational.
I accept the consensus of informed opinion on issues upon which I am uninformed until such time as I have a reason to doubt it.
This is not to say that I accept such a consensus blindly and without question, and — as anyone who knows me can tell you — I do have a tendency to actively question statements from authority. This is a very strange claim. Having said that, the fact is that the effects of warming oceans and increased atmospheric CO2 involve quite complex interactions between air and sea.
Increased atmospheric CO2 induces the oceans to absorb more of it too. Given that the oceans appear to be demonstrating a significant acidification, I would suggest that the CO2 lost by the oceans via the warming effect is outweighed by that gained through the absorption of increased atmospheric CO2.
The crude oil is coming with high sulphuric sludge, so my question is if we can rely on such oil to produce CO2 gas.?
August 4th, 7: On a practical level- Carbon dioxide emissions per litre of gasoline amount to 2. This is huge- a car travelling 10,km per year emits about two tons of carbon dioxide.
With maybe 2, million vehicles in the world, approximately 4, million tons of carbon dioxide emmitted annually from cars alone, along with roughly the same amount, million tons, of oxygen being used up from the atmosphere.
August 11th, 9: There are roughly 7 barrels to the tonne, giving an approximation of kg CO2, or kg of […].Carbon dioxide contributes significantly to global warming by entering the atmosphere and waterways through many human activities, such as farming, industrial operations and changes in land use, primarily to agricultural production.
Carbon dioxide occurs naturally through some activities, such as. Global Warming and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) The increase in the level of carbon dioxide has a very grave impact on the atmosphere.
The following article provides informarion about the various ways in which carbon dioxide is released in the atmosphere, and how it affects the atmosphere. Chlorofluorocarbons are to blame for global warming since the s and not carbon dioxide, according to new research from the University of Waterloo published in the International Journal of.
A review of the research literature concerning the environmental consequences of increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide leads to the conclusion that increases during the 20th and early 21st centuries have produced no deleterious effects upon Earth's weather and climate.
Coastal water absorbing more carbon dioxide Findings may help scientists understand how much carbon dioxide can be released while still limiting global warming.
The chart at left summarizes the % of greenhouse gas concentrations in Earth's atmosphere from Table rutadeltambor.com is not a very meaningful view though because 1) the data has not been corrected for the actual Global Warming Potential (GWP) of each gas, and 2) water vapor is ignored..
But these are the numbers one would use if the goal is to exaggerate human greenhouse contributions.