Compromise and Union Herodotus and Thucydides: Inventing History Herodotus wrote about the wars between Persia and Greece. Thucydides wrote about the civil war between Athens and Sparta. Together these ancient Greek writers became the first true historians in Western civilization.
We need to examine this issue, since the modern Greeks repeatedly argue that they are direct ethnic descendants of the ancient Greeks and Macedonians. The fact is that the ethnic, linguistic, and cultural developments that these invasions created simply built upon similar movements of peoples into and out of the Balkans in the ancient past.
For instance, in speaking of the movements of Germanic tribes in the Balkans before the Slavs, the writer of Macedonia History and Politics says that the Goths were beaten off and the invasions in the fourth century did not lead to "ethnological adulteration.
Macedonia has been represented as a buffer protecting Hellenism from the waves of the barbarians throughout the centuries. Thus it is argued by modern Greeks that the area of the present-day Republic of Macedonia was affected by these barbarian invasions, but the lands that are now Greece were largely unaffected.
The American political scientist Buck explained that the notion of physical kinship implied in the word "nation" is the most conspicuous element in the popular conception of nationality. However, it is also the least realistic. Buck points out that we have only to think of the extent of invasion and colonization that has occurred in nearly every corner of Europe to realize that this notion could at best be only approximate.
More importantly, from the viewpoint of historical analysis, it is not possible to demonstrate national family connections. Recorded descent is at best restricted to a few families that are notable for some reason or another.
All that can be shown convincingly is linguistic descent, but this is often taken as evidence of national descent. Smith points out, specifically in reference to the modern Greek nation, "Greek demographic continuity was brutally interrupted in the late sixth to eighth centuries A.
The editor of The Times, long the most prestigious of British newspapers, wrote in August Today, the historical refusal to acknowledge ethnic or cultural plurality has transmogrified into a refusal to accept political dissent in relation to these ethnic or cultural questions.
The obsession with Greek racial identity involves the distortion of the history of the thousands of years when there was no such thing as a Greek nation state. Many of the views that follow explain that, whether the Greeks feel comfortable with the idea or not, their peoples are of diverse ethnic background, a great mix of the peoples of the Balkans, and have been for the past several thousand years.
If all of the peoples of the Balkans were subjected to mixture of varying degrees with the invaders, as was certainly the case, then the argument might readily be made that modern-day Greeks are no more ethnically related to early Greeks than present-day Macedonians are to ancient Macedonians.
A common assumption is that ancient peoples were ethnically homogenous. As has already been noted with regard to the peoples of Macedonia, the kingdom was undoubtedly a great mix of people, and the diversity increased with the expansion of the Macedonian Empire.
There was probably a comparable mix of peoples in various Greek city-states. While the Greeks who came into the Balkan peninsula became the dominant people in that area, strong influences from the earlier inhabitants remained.
A widely accepted view is that the Indo-European language moved into Greece from Anatolia with the spread of agriculture around B. There were also infiltrations or invasions from the north by Indo-European speakers sometime during the fourth or third millennium B.
Bernal suggests an explanation of ancient Greek development in terms of what he calls "the ancient model. Up to the eighteenth century A. Bernal suggests that the sense of loss that this created, and the quest to recover the lost wisdom, were major motives in the development of science in the seventeenth century.
Bernal argues that the ancient model was accepted by historians from antiquity till the nineteenth century, and was rejected then only for anti-Semitic and racist reasons.
He sees the Egyptian and Phoenician influence on ancient Greeks as beginning in the first half of the second millennium B. He concludes that Greek civilization is the result of the cultural mixtures created by these colonizations and later borrowings from across the eastern Mediterranean.
These borrowings from Egypt and the Levant occurred in the second millennium B. Instead they derived them - through the early colonization and later study by Greeks abroad - from the east in general and Egypt in particular. According to both Herodotus and Thucyclides, Pelasgians formed the largest element of the early population of Greece and the Aegean, and most of them were gradually assimilated by the Hellenes.
Herodotus saw this transformation as following the invasion by Danaos the Egyptianwhich he took to be around the middle of the second millennium B. Herodotus stated that the Egyptian Danaids taught the Pelasgians not the Hellenes the worship of the gods.The Myth of Greek Ethnic 'Purity' Macedonia and Greece, John Shea, pp THE GREAT ETHNIC MIX OF GREECE.
Just as Macedonia and other Balkan states were invaded by Slavs and other peoples from the north and from within the Balkans themselves, so were the lands that eventually were to become modern Greece. Herodotus wrote about the wars between Persia and Greece.
Thucydides wrote about the civil war between Athens and Sparta. Together these ancient Greek writers became the first true historians in Western civilization.
The Battle of Thermopylae is the most famous battle of the Second Persian Invasion of Greece and one of the most famous battles in European ancient history.
An account of the ancient battle between Persia and the alliance of Greek city-states, including the legendary “ Spartans.” In BCE, Persian king Xerxes led a massive invasion of Greece. CHAPTER I. THE BATTLE OF MARATHON Explanatory Remarks on some of the circumstances of the Battle of Marathon.
Synopsis of Events between the Battle of Marathon, B.C. , and the Defeat of the Athenians at Syracuse, B.C. The Battle of Marathon (Greek: Μάχη τοῦ Μαραθῶνος, Machē tou Marathōnos) took place in BC, during the first Persian invasion of rutadeltambor.com was fought between the citizens of Athens, aided by Plataea, and a Persian force commanded by Datis and rutadeltambor.com battle was the culmination of the first attempt by Persia, under King Darius I, to subjugate Greece.